Ids Alive:
The Madness of King George
Nell

review by Rob Gonsalves

DIRECTOR
Nicholas Hytner

SCREENWRITER
Alan Bennett
based on his play
The Madness of George III

PRODUCERS
Stephen Evans
David Parfitt

CINEMATOGRAPHER
Andrew Dunn

MUSIC
George Fenton

EDITOR
Tariq Anwar


CAST

Nigel Hawthorne (George III)
Helen Mirren
(Queen Charlotte)
Ian Holm
(Dr. Willis)
Rupert Graves
(Greville)
Amanda Donohoe
(Lady Pembroke)
Rupert Everett
(Prince of Wales)
Julian Rhind-Tutt
(Duke of York)
Julian Wadham
(Pitt)


MPAA rating: PG-13
Running time: 107m
U.S. release: December 1, 1994
Video availability: VHS - DVD


Other movies by Nicholas Hytner
reviewed on this site:

- The Crucible
- The Object of My Affection


DIRECTOR
Michael Apted

SCREENWRITERS
William Nicholson
Mark Handley
based on the play Idioglossia by
Mark Handley

PRODUCERS
Jodie Foster
Renée Missel

CINEMATOGRAPHER
Dante Spinotti

MUSIC
Mark Isham

EDITOR
Jim Clark


CAST

Jodie Foster (Nell Kellty)
Liam Neeson
(Dr. Jerome Lovell)
Natasha Richardson
(Dr. Paula Olsen)
Richard Libertini
(Dr. Alexander Paley)
Nick Searcy
(Sheriff Peterson)
Robin Mullins
(Mary Peterson)
Jeremy Davies
(Billy Fisher)


MPAA rating: PG-13
Running time: 113m
U.S. release: December 23, 1994
Video availability: VHS - DVD


Other movies by Michael Apted
reviewed on this site:

- Extreme Measures
- The World Is Not Enough


The Madness of King George is an eloquent, many-sided study of the effects of absolute power -- which, as we know, corrupts absolutely. It's alternately one of the funniest, saddest movies of the year. In 1788, a decade or so after we Americans so ingraciously refused our British hosts, King George III (Nigel Hawthorne) still obsesses about the country he has been denied. He has a way of pronouncing "United States" as if it were the name of a disloyal son who's gotten too big for his britches. The king, however, has more on his mind than the States. That is to say, he has everything on his mind and nothing on his mind; the king is going mad, and the assembled officials and hangers-on of the court find it harder and harder to chalk up his ravings as normal royal eccentricities.

Watching Madness unfold, I kept thinking, If only Caligula had been made this way! The movie, directed by Nicholas Hytner from a script by Alan Bennett (adapting his play), gives the monarchy its due while suggesting that the power of God, placed in man's imperfect hands, can derange the soul. The king dashes around, spewing "blasphemies," chasing ripe young women. Who is to stop him? No one may even look at him directly, much less challenge him. For a while, Hytner and Bennett play the king's robust instability for laughs. He could almost be Mel Brooks in History of the World Part I, who kept saying "It's good to be the king" as bouncing breasts made his eyes pop. But the spectacle of a monarch with no self-control is not only funny. Gradually, the notion becomes disturbing; with surprising force, the movie slips into tragedy. The king is incontinent and pathetic; he embarrasses everyone around him, and he embarrasses himself.

Few movies -- few works in any medium -- can shift gears this way without leaving us in the lurch. As we move between laughter and pangs of sadness, we can become resentful of the manipulation. Madness, though, is amazingly supple and generally unsentimental, and it acquires depth when it moves into the viewpoints of those who love King George and wish him well, and even those who simply want a well-appointed throne. The kingdom is about to revert to the next in power -- the Prince of Wales (Rupert Everett), the king's son, a useless, dispassionate wretch. The moviemakers feed us bits of court intrigue as the duplicitous officials fantasize about everything that will be accompished once mad old George is out of the way. We're offended at the idea of the king being supplanted -- an unusual sentiment for Americans to have. But the king, as played by Hawthorne, is worth saving. Polished by two years in the role on the stage, Hawthorne's performance is a study in extremes, and he pulls us into his emotions. When George's wife, Queen Charlotte (the touching Helen Mirren), speaks wistfully of the great, gentle man he used to be, we believe her even though George is bonkers almost from the start. Even at the peak of his delirium, an odd decency comes through.

The movie turns into a gripping melodrama, and also a comic contest of wills, when the king's supporters call in a big gun. Dr. Willis (Ian Holm), who runs an isolated farm for the insane, deduces that the king needs brute therapy. He must be torn down, made into a mere man, and then built up again. Holm, who even today looks as if he could head-butt his way through a brick wall, uses his pugnacious features to make Willis an intimidating authoritarian even when he isn't saying anything. Forgetting himself and lapsing into babble, the king is silenced by Willis' annihilating frown. This psychiatrist is up against the formidable obstacle of the very concept of monarchy. Willis' outrageous notion is that the king must be responsible for himself before he can be a responsible leader. Our hopes for his recovery operate on many levels, and his journey back to lucidity is gradual and convincing.

The Madness of King George strikes notes of absurdity and horror, slapstick and anguish. By the end of this complex and satisfying movie, we respect the man on the throne, because we've seen the pressures that drove him from it and the hard work that restored him. Should we not give some slack to the human men and women who occupy seats of power? Would any of us sit there comfortably?


"Chick-a-bay," says Jodie Foster throughout Nell; loosely translated, it means "Oscar number three, here I come." Nell is the sort of heartwarming terrible movie that invites comparisons to Rain Man, Awakenings, and all the other tearjerkers about innocent, afflicted people at odds with callous society. The film is stunningly awful on almost every level; in addition to Foster, whose judgment since The Silence of the Lambs seems to have gone to hell, there's Liam Neeson and Natasha Richardson and director Michael Apted and co-writer William Nicholson (Shadowlands) -- not a hack in the bunch. So what happened?

Foster, as you may have assumed, is Nell, a young woman living in isolation in a North Carolina shack. Her mother has died; the local delivery boy (Jeremy Davies) finds the body, and the kindly Dr. Jerry Lovell (Neeson) comes to investigate and finds Nell. Jerry and psychologist Paula Olsen (Richardson) take a keen interest in Nell, observing her first from afar and then up close as she grows more comfortable with them. Speaking to them in her own strange tongue, Nell adopts them as her new parents. The scenes of Nell and her new guardians trying to communicate are involving; this stuff gets to you the way it always has. But then Nell, who has a tragic past to rival the character Foster played in The Accused, turns out to be far more than just a woman who doesn't get out much. She's meant to be a free spirit who heals troubled souls by her sheer primitive purity. When Nell started her healing shtick, I thought that she and Forrest Gump would make a great couple.

Mark Handley co-adapted his play Idioglossia (roughly, "one's own foreign language"), and the material is still terribly stagy, except for repeated, gratuitous moonlit shots of Nell skinny-dipping. Executive producer Foster works maniacally -- this is a real Streep turn -- but even her great talent can't scrape off the sentimental lint. Nell the backwoods angel has all her teeth, and they're all perfectly white. And when she makes her climactic speech in a crowded courtroom -- during a hearing to decide whether to institutionalize her -- Nell reaches deep down and breaks out a string of pieties about how we all have big things to say but never look in each other's eyes. Or grunts to that effect. For a woman who's been isolated since birth, and has also recently been lapsing in and out of catatonia, she's a pretty damn glib public speaker.

That's only the most shameless moment in a movie full of them. Second place goes to the scene in which Nell wanders into a grubby bar; apparently confused as to how best to express her sexuality, she begins to strip while the barflies (including the delivery boy from the beginning) leeringly encourage her. Jeremy Davies was terrific in Spanking the Monkey, but if I'd seen him here for the first time, I'd never want to see him again; his crude, one-note performance adds to the tastelessness of the scene, which inadvertently functions as another chance to give us a peek at the executive producer's breasts. And why would this woman, who since childhood has had the fear of rape drilled into her, suddenly throw caution to the wind? (And is Jodie Foster drawn to roles in which she's degraded in bars?) Is it because of the stupid preceding sequence in which Dr. Jerry lets Nell see his penis, to reassure her that not all men are bad? Didn't Liam Neeson learn his lesson in The Good Mother, where he let Diane Keaton's daughter touch his schmecky and got Diane in big trouble? Liam, keep your goodies to yourself until further notice, okay?

Sitting there in a funk as Nell devolved further into sappiness, I wondered how Michael Apted, who has made several acclaimed documentaries, would have handled this material as a documentary, if he had found a real Nell somewhere in North Carolina. (Speaking of which, that state is far prettier than this movie indicates. Apted and his crew must have scouted for the blandest, grayest locations they could find.) A real-life Nell would have been dirty and unglamorous and truly mysterious. The point of Nell -- solving the mystery of this woman -- also robs her of any fascination. By the end, we've been spoon-fed every bit of data necessary to diagnose her. The movie should have a long life in Psych 101 courses.

Nell begins strongly enough to give you faith in the competence of the director and cast. Natasha Richardson flawlessly fakes a Southern accent (at times, she sounds like Foster's Clarice Starling), Neeson continues his skill with American accents of indeterminate origin, and Foster -- well, she does Nell about as well as Nell can be done. But too many other factors work against the actors, such as Mark Isham's score -- one of those hushed, rapturous numbers, which swells every time Nell flashes her ass or remembers frolicking with a little girl. (Are we not supposed to guess within seconds who the other girl is?) Then there's the final scene, set "five years later," in which Nell, happily picnicking with all her nice friends, dances with Jerry and Paula's little daughter (yes, Nell brings the two docs together) and, God help us, teaches her to say "Chick-a-bay."

Nell skipping from rock to rock in a nearby river may become as durable an image as Gump on the bus-stop bench. As a nation, we're feeling degraded and strung-out and violent, and so we turn to guardian angels and Gumps and Nells to lull us into complacency. But complacency in these harrowed times spells doom. That's why I kick so much at a candied daydream like Nell. The constant stream of positive life lessons can feel like a pillow being pressed over your face.




HOME - Q&A - MISCELLANY - LIVEJOURNAL - COOL LINKS - RARE VIDEO RESOURCE LINKS
CULT MOVIES ARCHIVE - TIRADES - BEST/WORST MOVIE LISTS - CONTACT